Atlético de Madrid’s Winter Market Dynamics: Challenges and Changes

Joao Gomes, Ederson, Kang-in Lee, Goretzka, and Marcos Leonardo were among the names mentioned, followed by late arrivals including Lookman, Rodrigo Mendoza, and Vargas.

A Turkish journalist, speaking Spanish, inadvertently posed a question to Diego Pablo Simeone about a player named ‘Topocho,’ presumed to be a potential signing. This mix-up encapsulated the challenges faced during Atlético de Madrid’s winter transfer market: the coach interpreted the inquiry as concerning a fictitious player, who had no more chance of joining than many others.

As the January window closed on the 2nd, it became evident that, beyond last-minute signings intended to provide a visual boost, Mateu Alemany had arrived not only to enhance the squad but also to manage complex issues others were hesitant to tackle. This was indicative of problems that had been previously suggested to his predecessor, who was unable to address them, thus prompting Alemany’s appointment, akin to a problem-solver in a crisis.

The situation raises questions about preparing Atlético for a future without El Cholo (Simeone), as discussions have recently surfaced regarding potential successors like Marcelino or Iraola, which might surprise figures such as Fernando Torres and Filipe Luis.

The announcement of Javi Galán on December 24, prior to the market opening, was followed by the official departures of Carlos Martín, Gallagher, and Raspadori on January 2, 14, and 15, respectively. This signifies that Atlético, already struggling with an unbalanced squad since the summer, operated with four fewer player registrations for over two weeks during a crucial month filled with competing tournaments, ranging from La Liga to the Champions League.

With only 20 players available, injuries like Griezmann’s and Giuliano’s illness forced Simeone to rely heavily on his squad during closely scheduled matches, such as those against Bodo Glimt and Levante, leaving minimal room for rotation. While this does not justify the team’s performance, it may help explain the results. The diminished roster, especially given that some players were not significantly contributing, has affected both internal competition during training and the match minutes for those remaining.

In this context, Alemany has also engaged with the youth academy, though results have shown that collective performance is more vital than individual talent. The most sought-after player, Arnau Ortiz, is already 24 and joined from a relegated Polish team, while Jano has not secured a consistent place under Torres unless Rayane is unavailable.

Alemany’s directive emphasizes bringing in only ‘top-level’ players, as if his peers at other clubs would prefer subpar talent. Every team desires the best, despite financial constraints that necessitate creativity in recruitment.

One must acknowledge that Alemany enjoys favorable public perception, both literally and metaphorically. The ongoing tensions with El Cholo are of particular interest, as what begins as a skirmish could escalate into a full-blown conflict, necessitating allegiances. While the coach should ideally have the support of the fans, Alemany finds himself navigating the club as a professional, much like his previous stints at Mallorca, Valencia, or Barcelona. However, the team’s performance inevitably impacts perceptions: even 14 years later, many supporters are inclined to favor a fresh face over a familiar, worn one.

The competitive landscape has intensified, and it appears that, with upper management observing placidly, only one entity will ultimately prevail. Will it be the one unwilling to adapt, or the one deemed undesirable? Time will tell who emerges victorious, but the outcome is clear: Atlético is losing.