Addressing Unacceptable Practices in Soccer: The Case for Change

omidbasir- As a devoted observer of numerous soccer matches, one might overlook the gradual shift in the game’s dynamics. We often become desensitized to the evolving nature of play, akin to a frog in boiling water. However, during the next corner or free kick, I urge you to pay close attention. Observe the instances of grabbing, holding, twisting, blocking, and players whose primary role seems to be colliding with their opponents. These actions often unfold while the ball is still in the air, sometimes even before the action commences.

Initially, this might seem like a standard part of the game, and I occasionally feel the same. Yet, it’s essential to recognize that this behavior is neither beneficial for the sport nor necessary.

At a recent match between Chelsea and Brentford, I noted this trend clearly. Brentford executed nine corner kicks, each marred by excessive physicality. Central defender Kristoffer Ajer—a frequent player involved—would deliberately obstruct Chelsea’s goalkeeper, Robert Sánchez. Chelsea’s Enzo Fernández typically responded by attempting to push Ajer aside, resulting in a physical tussle reminiscent of NFL linemen battling for position. On several occasions, both players ended up in the net, showcasing the chaotic nature of such set pieces.

The penalty area was a scene of grappling, shirt-pulling, and various maneuvers aimed at gaining an upper hand. Like many viewers, I found myself desensitized to the spectacle, but a moment of clarity prompted me to question: “What am I witnessing?”

My passion for soccer developed from the beauty of the game, not from observing grown men engage in wrestling matches. Such physical confrontations are inconsistent with the game’s spirit. If a player like Declan Rice were to impede Kylian Mbappé with a bear hug, it would be considered a foul. Similarly, if Virgil van Dijk were to body-check Lamine Yamal, the referee would intervene. However, during corner kicks, such offenses often go unpunished.

I do not hold players accountable; they naturally test the limits of what referees will permit. Likewise, referees are not solely adhering to the Laws of the Game; they follow directives set forth by their officiating organizations. For reasons unknown, match officials have chosen to overlook these infractions.

One former referee explained, “Before the ball is in play, almost anything goes; at worst, you might receive a reprimand from the official. Once the game has begun, the general principle is to refrain from calling fouls unless the pushing is mutual or involves two hands. Although enforcement can vary by league, this is the typical interpretation.”

Some might argue that as long as referees maintain consistency, there is no significant issue. Yet, the controversy surrounding a recent penalty call in the Africa Cup of Nations final, when El Hadji Malick Diouf was penalized for tugging on Brahim Díaz’s shoulder, illustrates a deeper concern. While it was technically a foul, such actions had been overlooked throughout the match, leading to widespread discontent.

My issues with this behavior extend beyond the challenges referees face. Such practices not only tarnish the game’s image but also contribute nothing meaningful to the match. The chaotic scrummages during set pieces do not enhance my enjoyment of soccer. The spectacle of seasoned professionals engaged in this manner is far from what drew me to the sport; I could witness similar scenes at a local youth game.

This is not a critique of set pieces or the clubs that invest in specialized coaches for them, as they can undoubtedly add excitement to the game. However, players skilled in set-piece execution would excel regardless of the physical impediments they face during corners.

It is also essential to clarify that I appreciate physical play in soccer. I welcome robust tackles and shoulder challenges; they are integral to the sport’s excitement—just not when hands are involved inappropriately.

Arsène Wenger, currently FIFA’s Chief of Football Development, advocates for a ‘daylight rule’ regarding offside to encourage scoring. Yet, eliminating the blatant rugby-style tackles during corner kicks would likely yield a more significant increase in scoring opportunities.

It is difficult to imagine anyone truly enjoying the current state of affairs unless they are supporters of teams benefiting from such tactics. Thus, it is time to demand change.

Remarkably, this transformation can occur without altering the Laws of the Game. Law 12.1 stipulates that a direct free kick should be awarded when a player “holds an opponent” or “impedes an opponent with contact.” Enforcement of these rules, including warnings for pre-play holds and subsequent bookings for non-compliance, could foster a more dynamic and appealing game, leading to increased scoring and reducing controversy.

Is this a rigid stance? Certainly, but players and coaches will quickly adapt, as they are fundamentally being asked to revert to the essence of the game they have played throughout their lives: soccer.