6bc41a50 e0e2 11f0 b67b 690eb873de1b6bc41a50 e0e2 11f0 b67b 690eb873de1b

omidbasir-

For years, Manchester City under Pep Guardiola represented control — control of space, possession, tempo, and ultimately, matches.

This season, that control appears increasingly fragile.

The Illusion of Possession

City still dominate the ball. But possession without control is an illusion.

What has changed?

  • Slower circulation

  • Reduced positional sharpness

  • Less effective occupation of half-spaces

Opponents are no longer suffocated — they are waiting.

Defensive Vulnerability in Transition

Perhaps the most critical issue is defensive transition.

When City lose the ball:

  • The rest defense is often poorly structured

  • Central spaces open too easily

  • Opponents exploit vertical channels quickly

This is not a minor flaw — it is structural.

Midfield Imbalance

City’s midfield has historically been the brain of the system. Now, it looks less stable.

Problems include:

  • Gaps between lines

  • Lack of physical recovery speed

  • Over-reliance on specific profiles

Without balance, control collapses.

Predictability in Attack

Another growing issue is predictability.

City’s attacking patterns have become:

  • Easier to read

  • Slower to execute

  • Dependent on individual brilliance rather than system superiority

This is a significant shift from Guardiola’s peak years.

A Cycle, Not a Collapse

It would be simplistic to say Guardiola is “finished.” This is more likely a cycle.

But cycles require adaptation.

The question is no longer whether City are dominant.
It is whether Guardiola can evolve — again.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *